Search for: "R.G."
Results 101 - 120
of 389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2019, 3:30 am
Published on the eve of the Supreme Court’s hearing of blockbuster cases about whether gay and transgender people are protected under Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination “because…of sex” (R.G. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
” At The World and Everything in It, Mary Reichard presents “the point of view of the employee” in R.G. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:31 am
These cases concern whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employment discrimination “on the basis of sex” – perhaps the most significant phrase of Ginsburg’s legal career, the title of a recent biopic and one which she was sure to quote – also bars discrimination on the basis of transgender identity (in R.G. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:07 am
At his eponymous blog, Ernie Haffner unpacks the Department of Justice’s argument in R.G. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
At National Review, Mike Sharrow weighs in on R.G. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:13 am
At The World and Everything in It (podcast), Mary Reichard unpacks the arguments on behalf of the employer in R.G. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
Clayton County, Georgia and the gender-identity claims raised in R.G. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
Zarda and R.G. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:30 pm
R.G. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:33 am
” The second case on October 8 involves Aimee Stephens, who worked for six years as a funeral director and embalmer at R.G. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 4:10 am
Supreme Court and are now available from the SCOTUSblog case page in R.G. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s push for broader workplace protections”; she notes that DOJ’s brief in R.G. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 3:30 am
If you look on the docket in R.G. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 4:15 am
"The filing relates to the case of Aimee Stephens, a transgender woman who was fired as the funeral director of R.G. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:57 am
Regents of the University of California), and whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and sex stereotyping (R.G. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 6:26 pm
R.G. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 6:26 pm
R.G. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
” Briefly: At Take Care, Joshua Matz explains why “Title VII must be read as prohibiting discrimination based on transgender status,” answering a question presented in next term’s R.G. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
The Court’s decision in R.G. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
R.G. [read post]
