Search for: "S. v. G"
Results 101 - 120
of 17,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A nice summary of the meaning of these requirements in the context of criminal law provisions was provided by Lord Hope in R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] 1 AC 345, at paragraph 41: Accessibility means that an individual must know from the wording of the relevant provision and, if need be, with the assistance of the court’s interpretation of it what acts and omissions will make him criminally liable: see also Gülmez v… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 12:40 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:10 pm
A couple of weeks ago, I explored the Court of Federal Claims case of SH Synergy, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
Here is the abstract.L'oeuvre de François Gény a fait l'objet d'une véritable réception tant par la doctrine que par la jurisprudence louisianaises. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
Baker v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 7:06 pm
“Mueller’s Investigation Crosses the Legal Line: It’s unconstitutional under Morrison v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm
L'exclusion des procédés essentiellement biologiques de production de végétaux de l'Art 53 b) CBE peut-elle avoir un impact négatif sur une revendication de produit portant sur des végétaux ou du matériel végétal tel que des parties de végétaux ? [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
On February 29, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inVoisine v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:57 pm
LTC Lakin will be a guest on G. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 6:12 am
Here's the abstract:Report on Romania v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 6:07 pm
In A-G of the Commonwealth v Alinta Limited & Ors the High Court has granted special leave to appeal the Federal Court Full Court decision in APL v Alinta which limited the Takeover Panel's jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 10:00 pm
Honeywell International Inc., the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s finding that Solavay’s HFC patent was invalid under 35 USC § 102(g). [read post]
15 May 2011, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
eDiscovery Case Law: Citing Rule 26(g), Court Orders Plaintiff’s Counsel to Disclose Search Strategy
31 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Our 501st post on the blog addresses S2 Automation LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
Smith and G. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 12:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:49 am
"We will remand the record to the Immigration Judge to determine if the respondent is credible, consistent with the First Circuit’s remand order [ Reyes v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:00 pm
Kiklis and Stephen G. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:24 pm
See United States v. [read post]
