Search for: "Sauer v. Sauer" Results 101 - 120 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2018, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kliger-Weiss Infosystems, Inc. v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff failed to present any competent evidence to demonstrate that the firm that represented him in a real estate transaction, defendant Alouidor & Associates, P.C., did not exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438,… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Charles Sauer looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must establish, first, that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and, second, that the defendant’s failure was a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s damages (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Atiencia v Pinczewski, 148 AD3d 860 [2017]). [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the services he provided in Weinberg v Sultan, plaintiff simply asserted that defendant and her daughter were unable to provide facts concerning the closing, but made no showing that his investigation of the case, preparation of the complaint, and conduct of the litigation met the standard of “ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker, &… [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:33 pm by Jeffrey Carr
In fact, the issue of whether the police need a warrant to draw blood from a suspect was clearly addressed in Birchfield v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:16 pm by Patricia Salkin
Sauers v Lower Southampton Township, 2016 WL 7319679 (ED PA 12/15/2016)  Filed under: Current Caselaw, Due Process, Equal Protection, Zoning-Adopting/Amending [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:15 pm by Patent Docs
Hans Sauer, Associate General Counsel for Intellectual Property for the Biotechnology Industry Organization; and Patent Docs author Dr. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff contends on appeal that defendants failed to meet their initial burden of presenting evidence in admissible form establishing that they had exercised the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession in discharging their obligations to plaintiff (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Geraci v Munnelly, 85 AD3d 1361, 1362 [2011]; Adamski v Lama, 56 AD3d 1071, 1072… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff is required to show that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the attorney's breach of this duty caused the plaintiff to suffer actual and ascertainable damages (see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; McCoy v Feinman, 99… [read post]