Search for: "State v. ML" Results 101 - 120 of 287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2019, 2:24 am
CopyrightThe Kluwer Copyright Blog reports on the decision of the Vienna Higher Regional State Court in case Puls 4 v YouTube, which found that a platform operator is not (as of yet) obliged to monitor the information it transmits or stores or to investigate circumstances which point to unlawful activity. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm by Bill Marler
He stated he took a full-strength aspirin tablet (325 mg) every day but was not on any other blood thinners. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:47 am by Sander van Rijnswou
It is stated that "ICI 182780 was administered as a long-acting formulation contained in a castor oil-based vehicle by monthly i.m. injection (5 ml) into the buttock. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:24 am by INFORRM
  We have had 425,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 1:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
., appeal the decision of the United States DistrictCourt for the District of Delaware invalidating all assertedclaims of patents directed to COPAXONE® 40mg/mL, aproduct marketed for treatment of patients with relapsingforms of multiple sclerosis. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
In the recent judgment ML and WW v Germany ([2018] ECHR 554, french only) the Fifth Section of the ECHR has dismissed a ‘right to be forgotten’ application in respect of the publication of a historical murder conviction by the media. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm by Michael Madison
Existing LLM and MLS degrees serve some of these individuals, but certainly not all. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by Carl Custer
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 10:05 am by Giles Peaker
The argument was that the Upper Tribunal in Stevenage B.C. v ML (2016) UKUT 0164 had stated “the room should be capable of accommodating a single adult bed, a bedside table and somewhere to store clothes”, with reference to paragraph 33 of SSWP v Nelson (2014) UKUT 525 (AAC) (our note). [read post]