Search for: "State v. Null"
Results 101 - 120
of 618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2017, 1:00 pm
Failing to designate the individual to conduct a disciplinary hearing pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service Law in writing is a fatal jurisdictional error Hopton v Ponte, 2017 NY Slip Op 02649, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentNew York City Correction Officer [Petitioner] was found guilty of violating certain Department of Correction rules and was terminated from her position. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 4:15 am
" Further, said the court, the failure to designate a hearing officer for a disciplinary hearing in writing, as required by Civil Service Law §75(2), “is a jurisdictional defect that renders the hearing officer's determination null and void. [read post]
Extrinsic evidence of the intent of the parties of no moment in interpreting the terms of a contract
10 Nov 2008, 12:15 pm
"The agreement also provided that in the event "Any part of [the stipulation] which is found contrary to law shall be deemed null and void. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
[2] See Senators Wiener & Stern Respond to Governor Pausing Funding To Implement Landmark Climate Laws | Senator Scott Wiener (ca.gov) [3] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 1:19 am
Some guidance has however been given in Ryanair Ltd v PR Aviation BV (Case C-30/14) and Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort (VG Wort) v Kyocera and others (case 457/11). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
The Rules of the State Civil Service Commission, which apply to State officers and employees, provide that "every resignation shall be in writing" [4 NYCRR 5.3]. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:11 pm
Besides seeking to declare the laws null and void, the plea sought direction to the two states to not to give effect to impugned provisions and withdraw the same. [read post]
1 May 2017, 9:49 am
In Skye v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:06 pm
Pavon v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
Arizona, et al., Petitioners v United States The Court decided by five votes to three that three of four provisions inArizona’s Senate Bill 1070 were null. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:05 pm
” Partington v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:07 am
Varnum When the Iowa Supreme Court decided the Varnum v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:05 pm
Interestingly, the Court noted that both parties’ written … Continue reading which provides that on an application by a party, the court “shall” refer the parties to arbitration “unless it finds that the agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed”. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 4:45 am
Per Bannum, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:18 pm
Ambrosini v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:17 am
Additional Resources: Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 5:54 pm
Inc. v Oakes Towing Serv., Inc., 130 AD3d 1355, 1356 [2015]; Grant St. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:46 pm
v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
The Court of Appeal says that that's "[a]n illegal plea bargain," and hence "null and void. [read post]
