Search for: "State v. Rand" Results 101 - 120 of 479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member States will need to… [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 Lawson is a libertarian devotee of Ayn Rand, who, to be sure, figures in Kersch's book. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Rosie Burbidge reports on the Invista v Botes saga. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:16 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday evening the United States Department of Justice filed a statement in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
  Nicholas also set out the position in respect of injunctive relief following the Huawei v ZTE framework. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 3:05 am by Brian Cordery
ZyXEL stated in its pleadings that it was willing to take a licence on RAND terms. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 5:29 am
  At paragraphs 13 and 14, the judge stated that adopting such a position would:"...enable ZyXEL to benefit from their strategy of hold-out, including their refusal to submit to the outcome of an appropriate RAND determination, whilst still seeking to benefit from the RAND undertaking. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am by Peter Margulies
The March 6 decision by Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California in California v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Elizabeth Allan, Scott R. Anderson
These latter procedures, however, have been constitutionally suspect since the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 7:18 pm by Jamie Markham
Rand, No. 5:10-CT-3139-FL, 2011 WL 3664340 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]