Search for: "TIME, INCORPORATED v. Motor Publications" Results 101 - 120 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
  Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Wisconsin has enacted an “implied consent” law that provides that “[a]ny person who … drives or operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state … is deemed to have given consent to one or more tests of his or her breath, blood or urine” for purposes of determining the presence of alcohol or controlled substances in their system. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
Brown assisted Currier with the motor vehicle stop. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Susanne Fucks: “Die Zustellungsbevollmächtigung von inländischen Schadensregulierungsbeauftragten ausländischer Kraftfahrzeughaftpflichtversicherer” – the English abstract reads as follows: According to Art. 4 of the 4th Motor Insurance Directive all motor vehicle insurers are required to appoint a claims representative in each Member State other than that in which they have received their official authorisation. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm by admin
The general public should get informed that law enforcement will be conducting sobriety checkpoints at specific locations, dates, and times. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
He got her to admit that she was suggesting a different type of material or different material properties should have been incorporated in the design. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 8:24 am by Guest Blogger
Without all of that “legal infrastructure,” motor vehicle transportation would be too dangerous to use. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 3:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(about which refer here); Lordstown Motors (described here);  XL Fleet (here); Nikola Motors (here), QuantumScape (here), and Velodyne Lydar (here). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
NEMA contended that the relevant statutory definition unambiguously excluded all such motors exceeding 1 horsepower, as well as certain motors rated at and less than 1 horsepower, from being regulated as small electric motors. [read post]