Search for: "U.S. v. Smart*" Results 101 - 120 of 2,380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
As the Seventh Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm
A lawyer may still be able to help later in the case, but he or she can’t take back damaging statements made in the beginning—as the defendant found in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am by Hayley Evans, Shannon Togawa Mercer
Chapter V of GDPR governs the legality of transfers of personal data to third countries and allows for the transfer of data to a third country when the EC decides that “a third country...ensures an adequate level of protection” or when there are appropriate safeguards in place. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Council, Inc.,467 U.S. 837, 842 (1984); accord Cooper, 536 F.3d at 1337(quoting Hawkins v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Florian Mueller
The U.S. dispute started long before any German filings and had worldwide scope from the beginning because Motorola had sent demand letters to Microsoft (from one U.S. company to another) referring to worldwide standard-essential patent (SEP) licenses and even specifically listing the patents at issue in Germany.Not only has Google's Motorola recently brought the aforementioned royalty-collection lawsuit, in defiance of Judge Robart's FRAND rate-setting opinion, but it's also… [read post]