Search for: "US v. Holt" Results 101 - 120 of 333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Wei Li, Montefiore East Tremont Practice, Off¬Label Medical Device use by Surgeons Public Health Law Session 1E – Room 242Overarching Themes in Public Health LawModerator: Jonathan Todres, Georgia State University College of LawLance Gable, Wayne State University Law School, Public and Private Models of Public Health Governance in Trump’s AmericaLewis Grossman, American University Washington College of Law, The Taming of Progressive ‘State Medicine’James Hodge,… [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 3083 (ED MI, Jan. 10, 2017), a Michigan federal district court held that the Supreme Court's 2015 decision in Holt v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Insofar as the case tells us anything about Colloton’s views about federalism, it indicates that he is not eager to reach commerce clause questions if he does not have to. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, the employee’s remaining discrimination and retaliation claims failed, largely because the record was clear that he was terminated because he failed to turn in FMLA paperwork and he accepted a better-paying job Holt v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the employee’s remaining discrimination and retaliation claims failed, largely because the record was clear that he was terminated because he failed to turn in FMLA paperwork and he accepted a better-paying job (Holt v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 1:00 am by Giles Peaker
This is a guest post by Jonathan Holt of Garden Court North Chambers. [read post]
24 May 2016, 8:12 am by David Whitehead
Summary The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the appeal in PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Anor v O.W. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:08 am by Amy Howe
” Patrick Gregory of Bloomberg BNA reports that, in the wake of the Court’s 2015 decision in Holt v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The panel also held that plaintiffs’ admission that cannabis was merely a substitute for peyote also distinguished their case from Holt v. [read post]