Search for: "US v. James Poole" Results 101 - 120 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2013, 12:12 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Her accountant is letting us have his cottage with a swimming pool for 5 bob and a fart, so why not? [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
  The pool will likely continue much of this practice. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 2:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
To that list, the brief could have added the gas station rent control measure in Lingle v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I confess to being increasingly taken with suggestions that “the Court” might be composed of random selections from a far wider pool of federal judges and, I would add, chief justices of state supreme courts. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm by Tung Yin
Riley challenged this action as racially discriminatory under Batson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
James Horgan, a former President of IP Federation and assistant managing counsel at Merck Sharp & Dohme, commented that the IP Federation is "better value than any commercial organization. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:59 pm
The un-caged birds were using the manure, which was approximately 8 feet high, to access the egg laying area. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am by Florian Mueller
Also, as far as Microsoft's H.264-essential patents are concerned, Motorola could easily license them under the terms of the MPEG LA AVC/H.264 pool, anytime -- as its corporate parent, Google, already has.At any rate, Motorola uses the terms of a grant-back license as an argument in the Microsoft case for the claim that its original royalty demand (which corresponded to a $4 billion annual royalty figure) was FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm by David Ryan
The problem with this approach, according to defense attorney James Connell, is that this process can take “between weeks and months [and] on some occasions, years. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Back in the early days of the asbestos litigation in Philadelphia, a hotbed of early asbestos litigation, plaintiffs and defendants each identified a pool of available expert witnesses on lung diseases. [read post]