Search for: "United States v. 44 CASES, ETC."
Results 101 - 120
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm
Chandresekhara Thevar, AIR 1948 PC 12 and (iii) Secy. of State for India v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Contrary to the position in Case 132/78 Denkavit [1979] 3 CMLR 605 and Cases C-441/98 etc Kapniki Mikhailidis [2001] 1 CMLR 13, on which the Court of Appeal relied, “the present scheme identifies, according to objective criteria, the time when sea fish or sea fish products can be said to enter the United Kingdom market on a commercial basis, following upon their production or importation and firsthand sale (in whichever order these events occur). [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Upon entry into force of this Treaty, the Extradition Treaty between the United States and Great Britain signed at London, December 22, 1931, will cease to have effect, with certain exceptions, between the United States and Malaysia. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:57 pm
See, for example, Trimex v Vedanta, where the Supreme Court did not cite even a single Indian decision related to the case when there were at least three to four Indian decisions relating to the issue. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
Rubber Mulch Etc., LLC, 620 F.3d 1287, 1296 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Rubber Mulch Etc., LLC, 620 F.3d 1287, 1296 (Fed. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:48 pm
Schneider case which resulted in the largest ever IP judgment in China of 330 Million CNY ( about US $44 Million). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:25 am
Today’s case of the day, Hubei Gezhouba Sanlian Indus., Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:13 am
Id. at 364, 188 S.E.2d at 843-44. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[25] The Mississippi Supreme Court said that the domicile of the twins was off of the reservation and that the state court properly had jurisdiction over the adoption proceedings of those twins.[26] In support of its position, the Supreme Court of Mississippi stated that the lower court judge “did conform and strictly adhere to the minimum federal standards governing adoption of Indian children with respect to parental consent, notice, service of process,… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[25] The Mississippi Supreme Court said that the domicile of the twins was off of the reservation and that the state court properly had jurisdiction over the adoption proceedings of those twins.[26] In support of its position, the Supreme Court of Mississippi stated that the lower court judge “did conform and strictly adhere to the minimum federal standards governing adoption of Indian children with respect to parental consent, notice, service of process,… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
Burford v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm
The case of Lindon v France (2008] 46 EHRR 35 is a good example of the new approach of the court. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:41 am
The appellant could not involve in the day to day affairs of the second respondent company and other companies as he had to travel to United Kingdom often for his treatment. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Edgar, 44 Va. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The three sources of international law are stated and defined in the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (R3dFRLUS), Section 102. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Edgar, 44 Va. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
This Second Circuit appeal concerns the dismissal of Grosz v. [read post]
