Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics Corp."
Results 101 - 120
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2010, 5:39 pm
Marasco, General Manager, Standards Strategy, Microsoft Corp. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:39 pm
United States, supra, at 175, 100 S.Ct., at 390. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:07 pm
J.A. 1–55 (Final Written Decision,Wangs Alliance Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
But there may be few more fascinating, and regularly shifting, areas of judicial juggling than that of the application of the doctrine of fair use under United States copyright law. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Rather, the calculation of damages necessarily requires speculation regarding what price the parties would have negotiated if the data had been disclosed.[20] The Government has the burden to show “by some reasonable method” the amount it believes the final contract price was overstated.[21] There is a rebuttable presumption that the “natural and probable consequence” of defective cost or pricing data is a “dollar for dollar” increase in the contract price.[22]… [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
Dynamics Corp.,[5] however. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:14 pm
On Wednesday afternoon local time Apple filed a petition asking the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which hears all appeals of U.S. patent infringement cases, for an "initial hearing en banc" on Judge Koh's recent denial of a permanent injunction against Samsung. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:25 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
Vergeer en Zonen before District Court of The Hague (Class 46) Poland Polish Patent Office partially invalidates VOGUE registration for Advance Magazine Publishers (Class 46) Poland, brands and billboards (Class 46) South America South American cooperation plan in IP rights (IP tango) Spain Spanish Ministry of Employment auctioning brand ‘Galerías Preciados’ (Class 46) Russia Interbrand’s ranking of Russia’s most valuable brands (IP finance)… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
AUKUS: Biden’s New Security Agreement On Sept. 15, the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia announced a new security agreement. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Personal injury case.Hyatt Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court issued two decisions last year that are likely to increase the number of retaliation lawsuits because they expand the scope of protection. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
State lawmakers are generally better positioned than federal lawmakers to ascertain such in-state preferences and implement the best policies based on them. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
United States Surgical Corp., 147 F.3d 1374, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
