Search for: "United States v. Public Utilities Commission" Results 101 - 120 of 752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by John Bellinger
Or should all of the detainees have been moved to detention facilities in the United States? [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 6:44 am by Linda R. Evers
This law came to my attention when reviewing a recent New Hampshire Public Utility Commission (“NHPUC” or “Commission”) order denying a request for hearing on the installation of smart meters. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*El-Nahal alleged that the installation of such devices having tracking abilities amounted to a property-based search within meaning of United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:56 am by Florian Mueller
Based on a Samsung filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that entered the public record yesterday, I must answer this question with a resounding "Yes!" [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
International Trade Commission (USITC) is holding a public hearing on February 13, 2014. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
Oct 3: National Mining Association (NMA) President and CEO Hal Quinn announced that the association was filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration and stay and petition for review of U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am by WIMS
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]