Search for: "United States v. Sandoz"
Results 101 - 120
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
” Five years ago today, the Court issued its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
On the first day after a long Thanksgiving weekend, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied, without stating any particular reasons, a petition filed by Samsung earlier this month for a further rehearing en banc in an Apple v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: India: Discussion of Delhi High Court Dasatinib order – patent linkage between Indian Patent Office and Office of the Drug Controller General of India (Patent Circle) (Spicy IP) (Patent Circle) (Managing Intellectual Property) Lescol (Fluvastatin) – US: EWHC finds sustained release Fluvastatin patent invalid on ground of… [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union… [read post]
24 May 2018, 12:27 am
Cir. 2007) (quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
Sandoz v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:39 am
The civil law suit, Beaty v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
United States Postal Service, No. 17-1594 (Whether the government is a “person” who can petition to institute a CBM; Does a 1498(a) action count as an infringement action?) [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:44 am
DOJ considered Sandoz’s full timely cooperation with the United States’ investigation on other generic drug manufacturers, and that a conviction would have likely resulted in Sandoz’s mandatory exclusion from all federal healthcare programs under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
”) Post Grant Admin: Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
Illinois 13-5967Issue: Whether a defendant is acquitted for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, where a court grants a motion for directed verdict after the prosecution refuses to present any evidence at trial to the empaneled and sworn jury. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:13 am
Joe represents one of the successful moving defendants in the very recent decision that's described below.Take it away Joe:*****************On January 30, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of Sandoz Inc., APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., and Hospira, Inc. with respect to all remaining plaintiffs in the generic pamidronate… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Sandoz Inc., 2013 WL 308768 (S.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer’s settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:24 am
In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
