Search for: "Wells v. Place" Results 101 - 120 of 31,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 7:18 am by Joel Gora
As is well known, the Buckley Court split the difference. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
In the ongoing struggle between Apple and Motorola over claims of patent infringement in just one of many battles that is taking place across the country over smart phones, both parties proposed claim constructions that were not particularly well-written for lay jurors. [read post]
31 May 2014, 8:52 am by Nancy Rapoport
  (Sarah Weddington was our commencement speaker during my first year of dean at the University of Houston Law Center, and I invited her because she was someone who was effective as a lawyer, in the Texas Legislature, and in the Carter Administration--and I consider her a friend.)Law graduates who didn't appreciate her work as the lawyer in Roe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:48 pm by James Eckert
The Court of Appeals also stressed repeatedly the DA's theory, implying perhaps that a prosecution can be tailored to fit particularly nasty Molineux evidence.The Court also upheld the use of Molineux to prove identity where the complainant was the defendant's wife and the defendant admitted being present at the scene of the crime when it took place (People v Agina Case #12). [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 7:49 pm
So I will stick to what I know, which is the Left Side of the "v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:23 am by laborprof lpb
Jon Harkavy sends us the particularly well-written opinion, issued on Friday, of Merritt v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 5:55 am
The Fourth Circuit court of appeals recently handed Louis Vuitton its latest (well deserved) defeat in its suit against dog-toy maker, Chewy Vuiton in Haute Diggity Dog v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
If no appropriate vacancy shall exist to which such reinstatement may be made, or if the work load does not warrant the filling of such vacancy, the name of such person shall be placed on a preferred list for his former position in his former department or agency, and he shall be eligible for reinstatement in his former department or agency from such preferred list for a period of four years. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am by Jeff Redding
’  I say this only to emphasize that I am not particularly invested in the outcome of the ‘2 v. 3’ debate. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:56 am
  He challenged this as well, upon the basis that the underlying predicate conduct, having the weapon at home in available and operable condition, was consistent with his Second Amendment rights per Heller.The Court held: In view of D.C. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am by Wendy McGuire Coats
   And since the mandate is in place before any law enforcement action is taken, every law enforcement action is impacted by the initial mandate. [read post]