Search for: "Ginsburg v. United States" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 5:27 pm by Jason Mazzone
The gist of Common Cause's wide-ranging complaint is that the two justices "attended . . . retreats sponsored by Koch Industries, the second-largest privately held corporation in the United States and a major political player that directly benefited from the Citizens United decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm by James Bickford
United States, the Court wrestled with the question of whether convictions for offenses involving coca paste should be subject to the same mandatory minimum sentence as those involving crack. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:29 am by Ronald Mann
On Wednesday morning, the Justices started with what might seem to be a minor tax case, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:59 am by Rich McHugh
In her dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated that she believed the Court inadvertently “ventured into a minefield. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:27 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, No. 10-5443, involves a federal witness tampering prosecution for killing a local police officer who discovered the perpetrators preparing to rob a bank. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm by William Funk
”   Justice Ginsburg wrote a short concurrence stating that the decision involved a case challenging EPA’s jurisdiction, not a case challenging the “terms and conditions” of the order. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
On October 23, 1987, the United States Senate held one of the most-controversial votes on a Supreme Court nominee in its history, when it rejected Robert Bork’s appointment. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm by Jeremy Gordon
Srinivasan challenges Phillips’ third contention, suggesting that United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:17 am by Lyle Denniston
  That, at least, seemed likely after a ninety-minute argument on Monday in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
State legislatures, we [have] pointed out, performed an ‘electoral’ function ‘in the choice of United States Senators under Article I, section 3, prior to the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment,’ a ‘ratifying’ function for “proposed amendments to the Constitution under Article V,’ as explained in Hawke v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 am by Amy Howe
  Justice Ginsburg also wrote a brief separate dissent to express her view that “the Court has carried beyond the pale the immunity possessed by States of the United States. [read post]