Search for: "In Re Amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2015, 3:54 pm
The Code of Civil Procedure is amended bychanging Section 13-202 as follows: (735 ILCS 5/13-202) (from Ch. 110, par. 13-202) Sec. 13-202. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Reducing Juvenile Confinement Secure Custody Review Hearings – Amended G.S. 7B-1903(c) codifies the holding of In re D.L.H., 198 N.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 2:23 pm
Lexbox uses some math to guess how many alerts you might expect, and while this can lead to some amusing guesswork, it’s also probably a good idea that you know in advance if your alert to get all references to Ontario’s Rules of Procedure might produce an unrealistic amount of reading. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:50 am
Examples include:the 2015 interpretation on environmental public interest litigation, the 2015 interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law, discussed here, and the 2012 judicial interpretation of the Foreign-Related Civil Relations Law, and the 2013 joint Court and SPP interpretation on internet speech crimes. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
The 1993 amendments made clear, however, that Rule 26 sets out mandatory minimum requirements that do not define or exhaust the available discovery tools to obtain information from expert witnesses[3]. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 a few weeks ago, in Walker v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
The 1993 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure created an automatic right to conduct depositions of expert witnesses[8]. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 10:31 am
It states:In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.Despite the clear and unequivocal language preserving the right to jury trial, this right has been significantly diminished by the summary judgment procedure in federal… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
#noguarantees In case you’re just returning from a long-weekend sojourn to Mars, on Friday, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment requires a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-State. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
FRANCISCO "FRANK" LOPEZ, No. 13-1026 (Tex. 2015) Mandatory Lawfirm-Client Arbitration except for Fee Claims Against the Client: What if the client counterclaims under the civil barratry statute? [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
Human Rights Council (A/HR/RES/"&/9 (14 July 2014) to create an open-ended intergovernmental working group to elaborate such an instrument. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
Press, 347 U.S. 522 (1954), the law regards immigration consequences as collateral, civil matters. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
§ 1915, that requires prisoners filing civil cases in forma pauperis to pay filing fees through monthly payments of twenty percent of their income. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
§ 2284), a single judge can determine that a complaint is insubstantial and therefore that a three-judge panel is unnecessary not because the complaint is frivolous, but because it fails to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:13 pm
In view of the deadlines specified in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the discovery stay in the Manager’s Amendment would normally only last for a maximum of three to four weeks (from the Rule 26(f) conference until the case management order issues). [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Stuart 14-1172Issue: Whether North Carolina's statutory requirement that an ultrasound image be displayed and described to the patient prior to an abortion procedure violates the First Amendment rights of the provider. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
§ 2284 is insubstantial, and that three judges therefore are not required, not because it concludes that the complaint is wholly frivolous, but because it concludes that the complaint fails to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Chatman, 14-8589, involves a fairly thorny habeas procedural issue that, if you’re a real sucker for that sort of thing, you can read more about on your own d**n time. [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Touch the detonator in my pocket and we’re all goin’ BOOM! [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:19 am
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 45. [read post]
