Search for: "People v. Sample" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Jeff Gamso
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
King, upholding a Maryland law authorizing the collection of DNA samples from people who are arrested for violent crimes. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am by Amy Howe
  This year is no exception:  on Monday, a sharply divided Court upheld a Maryland law that allows police to take DNA samples from people who are arrested for “serious” crimes, and Court watchers are still waiting on cases involving same-sex marriage and affirmative action. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 8:15 am
Alonzo King was arrested April 10, 2009 for menacing a group of people with a shotgun and charged with first- and second-degree assault. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
  In large part, Greenland’s objections turn on conjecture that risks are not stochastically distributed in the population samples studied in epidemiologic studies. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 3:33 pm
  Take for example the recent case of Beattie v Beattie, 2013 SKQB 127 (CanLII), a family law case wherein a BC woman was claiming the need for extended spousal support from her former husband based on her lifestyle. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:13 am
— over the years as people used the word as a humorous euphemism, causing it to sound — at least to me — like a insult. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
This week, the US Supreme Court ruled that police may take DNA samples from people arrested in connection with serious crimes. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:58 pm by Jeff Gamso
  OK, OK, I'm maybe being unnecessarily obtuse.The Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in Maryland v. [read post]