Search for: "*u. S. v. Nation" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am by Michael Geist
U is for unwanted telemarketing calls that kept coming despite the existence of a national do-not-call list. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 6:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Russell, the 1996, Austin Court of Appeals opinion styled, American National Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:14 pm by Elin Hofverberg
The case became final on April 24, 2019, when the Norwegian Supreme Court refused to grant leave to hear its appeal (HR-2019-766-U, on file with author). [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:14 pm by Misha Tseytlin
In a symposium article for this blog posted in advance of the oral argument in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The investigation sprung from the Watergate scandal, which involved the 1972 break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters and Nixon’s attempts to cover-up his involvement. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:39 pm
[v]iolate any provision [of this section or] [b]e on duty or operate a commercial motor vehicle if, by the driver’s general appearance or conduct or by other substantiating evidence, the driver appears to have used alcohol within the preceding 4 hours. [read post]