Search for: "Does 1-51"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 3,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm
M&K is ordered to reimburse costs for, and reasonably related to, Hager’s prescribed medical marijuana.1. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
Mark: It does that. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 12:58 am
It should be noted, however, that Novartis obtained a centralized marketing authorization for the same valsartan/amlodipine combination not only under the proprietary name Exforge® (EU/1/06/370/001-024) but also under the proprietary names Dafiro® (EU/1/06/371/001-024), Copalia® (EU/1/06/372/001-024) and Imprida® (EU/1/06/373/001-024). [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:01 am
Court of Appeals today by a 2-1 vote dismissed the pending habeas corpus petitons of hundreds of Guantanamo detainees. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 10:04 pm
Supp. 51 (E. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
The EBA had held that Article 53(b) EPC does not exclude plants from patentability, even if they are obtained through an essentially biological process. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Instead it follows its own method, but does not always satisfy state requirements. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:31 am
" ChemTech 23 (6), 1993, p. 51-59. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
It does not blame regulatory tailoring for reduced supervisory intensity, except when SVB had assets between $50-$100 billion. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
See Hayashi, supra p. 3, at 50-51 (describing “competitive battlegrounds” in the ATM-network industry). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
Continental AG, 2000 WI 51, ¶38, 235 Wis. 2d 325, 611 N.W.2d 659. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Accordingly, I have not considered petitioner’s reply (Appeal of Reis and Argus, 51 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 16,335).Concerned Parents lacks standing to bring this appeal. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Id. at 51. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am
Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 750–51 (2001) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
(See Doc. 39 at 1.) [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:32 am
R. 1:7-4. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:48 am
§ 51-13-1 but this covers the high points. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:05 am
Does it make a difference if: (i) the word mark is superimposed over the graphic device? [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:29 pm
This does not pass the stright face test. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:48 am
§ 51-13-1 but this covers the high points. [read post]
