Search for: "State v. Duke"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 11:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:29 am
EMA and Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
Dukes, No. 10-277. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:39 am
” Courthouse News Service also reports on briefs filed in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Dukes, which redefined commonality and provided definitive guidance about when a party may invoke Rule 23(b)(2); AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:07 pm
However, James Cox, a law professor at Duke University, said the alleged disclosure by Paulson’s firm to ACA doesn’t necessarily destroy the SEC’s case. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 3:05 pm
Duke, 375 U.S. 106, 111, 84 S.Ct. 242, 245, 11 L.Ed.2d 186 (1963). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:47 am
On April 2, 2010 the court will hear argument in DRD Pool Service, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Finally ending its Second Amendment silence, the Supreme Court in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:42 am
Erwin Chemerinsky (Duke University) argued for the plaintiffs-appellants. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:18 am
In light of the ruling in Wal-Mart v Dukes, Fisher writes, the tobacco industry likely hoped that the court would take a skeptical view of smoking class actions and agree to hear the case. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:39 pm
United States, 530 U.S. 428, 120 S.Ct. 2326, 147 L.Ed.2d 405 (2000); United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 12:37 am
Sexual Harassment Jury Verdict Discrimination Laws in California Dukes v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Dukes. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
Duke Funderburke, a retired public school teacher, was suing to get his husband onto the health plan offered to retirees and their spouses. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:02 am
See Ugas v. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
V. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 9:54 am
Prison policies like these violate the Supreme Court precedent set in Turner v. [read post]
