Search for: "IN RE B E S"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 7,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2024, 9:14 am
Ainsi, les salariés qui, au cours d’une année de référence, n’ont pas cumulé plus de trois (3) occurrences d’absence et ne se sont pas absentés plus de dix (10) jours peuvent bénéficier dudit congé. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:35 am
Once it is in force, there will be no need to re-protect the deposit or re-serve the prescribed information. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 8:56 am
The IRS imposes stiff penalties for a taxpayer’s failure to file and pay on time. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:13 pm
[Citing to In re Wertheim, In re Woodruff, and In re Geisler.] [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:02 am
January 11, 2017 -11 AM: In re Shabby Chic Brands LLC, Serial No. 85135970 [Section 2(b) refusal of the mark shown below left, for various goods in class 20, 21, and 24, including furniture, dinnerware, and fabrics, on the ground that the mark includes a simulation or design that resembles a governmental insignia of the United Kingdom’s Prince of Wales emblem (shown below right)]. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
Froelich and joined by Judge Mary E. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 10:44 am
And if you’re looking for last year’s A to Z, check out the slideshow below. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:18 pm
Quant aux syndics bénévoles qui ne sont pas oubliés, ils devront suivre une formation dans les trois mois de leur première élection. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:32 pm
United Kingdom Judgment in Light of the Euratom Treaty’s Drafting History ESIL Corner Seline Trevisanut, Machiko Kanetake & Cedric Ryngaert, The In/ Ex-clusiveness of International Law: Some Remarks on the 17th Annual Conference of the European Society of International Law by the Local Organizers E. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:42 am
HILKERT, AND RICHARD B. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
B&B v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Applicant also asserted that its mark has co-existed with the Prince of Wales' emblem for 13 years without objection or confusion, but the Board pointed out that absence of objection or confusion is irrelevant, since Section 2(b) is an absolute bar, and confusion plays no part in the analysis.In re Empire Tech. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 1:07 am
As Tony Lathrop’s post summarizes, the “front burner” issues at the moment largely concern class action settlements, focusing in on possible limits to cy pres relief and greater clarity on what Rule 23(e)’s “fair, reasonable, and adequate” criteria mean. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Cependant, la requête a été rejetée à la lumière des critères établis dans R. c. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:45 am
l süre ile 4709 Say? [read post]
9 May 2010, 10:29 am
Entre autres, le temps n’est-il pas maintenant venu de le réécrire comme suit : « - d’ouvrir un compte bancaire ou postal séparé au nom du syndicat sur lequel sont versées sans délai toutes les sommes ou valeurs reçues au nom ou pour le compte du syndicat. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:33 pm
The case's focus was the definition of Probate Code § 6453(b)(2), i.e. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:26 am
The Examining Attorney should have asked for more information, under Rule 2.61(b), according to Judge Bucher. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm
(“Rembrandt”)appeals from the district court’s denial of Rembrandt’smotion for a new trial under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure60(b)(2) and (3). [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 12:27 pm
Ce breveté a un brevet couvrant A+B+C+D, mais argumente que la revendication portant sur A+B+C+D couvre aussi A+B+C+E, parce que E est équivalent à D. [read post]
