Search for: "L & G Productions" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2010, 2:57 am by Marie Louise
Holdings v Metabolite Labs (Patents Post Grant) US: District Court Arizona: Question of whether to incur ‘substantial expenses’ for testing and clinical trials does not create substantial controversy sufficient to assert declaratory relief claim: W L Gore & Assoc. v GI Dynamics (Docket Report) US: Correction of inventorship complaint: Salk Institute for Biological Studies v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
Dans l'article D5 les auteurs divulguent bien un produit, mais qualifient la technologie de production employée d'"exclusive" (proprietary), sans donner de détails. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Certain Semiconductor Chips With Minimized Chip Package Size and Products Contain- ing Same, No. 337-TA-605, slip op. at 79 (Int’l Trade Comm’n May 20, 2009) (Public Version) (“Final Determi- nation”). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm by Graham Purse
An adversarial approach to client services provides a “highly efficient” strategy in a fee-for-service system.18 Although G. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am by Schachtman
  Historian opinion testimony seems particularly apt to derail in product cases. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:18 am
Un procédé non microbiologique pour la production de plantes qui comprend (ou consiste en) des étapes de croisement sexué de la totalité du génome de plantes puis de sélection de plantes est en principe exclu de la brevetabilité comme étant "essentiellement biologique" au sens de l'Art 53 b) CBE. 2. [read post]