Search for: "Likely v. State" Results 1241 - 1260 of 82,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Gore, then, is that it further entrenches the monarch-like status of the United States Supreme Court as ‘ultimate constitutional interpreter,’ with a monarch-like royal prerogative to ignore ordinary legal restraints when necessary to protect the public good. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 11:23 am
  At least for civil procedure nuts.Which matters, because the United States can only remove "interpleader" claims against it to federal court pursuant to 28 USC 2410.But the Ninth Circuit correctly holds that if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck . . . . [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Why do the dissenters want to uphold state sovereign immunity in a case like this? [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Ashutosh Avinash Bhagwat (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted Sorrell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:50 am by Franita Tolson
First, I would like to thank Dan for inviting me to visit. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm by H. Scott Leviant
However, as the case approached trial, the United States Supreme Court reversed a grant of class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 11:32 am by Jessica Arons
Already, states like Missouri have signaled an intent to apply their abortion laws outside their own state borders. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 11:51 am
  No way I'd have gotten 100% before reading the Ninth Circuit's opinion on the issue.Here's your bonus question:  According to the Ninth Circuit this morning, are social workers in Washington State learned professionals? [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 2:49 am by Rose Hughes
However, the EPO Guidelines for Examination currently state that, in order to bring the description in line with the claims: "claim-like clauses must also be deleted or amended to avoid claim-like language prior to grant since they otherwise may lead to unclarity on the subject-matter for which protection is sought" (F-IV, 4.4). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
 Like here (in a case involving State Farm, no less), here and here. [read post]