Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Her life was saved through the best treatment the United States has to offer, but her trip potentially exposed hundreds to the disease. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
Rule 702 should have settled the debate over Daubert, as this rule for the admissibility of expert testimony is far stricter than any rule that existed in any jurisdiction in the United States before Daubert came out. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
” Canadian Muslim groups were quick to “categorically and unequivocally condemn” the attack. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
United States, which raises the question whether military commissions may constitutionally try offenses that are not recognized as international war crimes. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Harris, 13-1313, after the Court took a quick gander at California’s foie gras ban. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:43 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
" After the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit exposed the district court ruling as grossly erroneous, Google has apparently altered course and is trying a new trick in its continuing defense against Oracle's copyright infringement claim. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock * United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:55 pm
Department of Justice has a manual for United States Attorneys on “Prosecuting Intellectual Property Crimes. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:02 am
United States,[1]which the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
McDonald’s Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC., UNITED PHOSPHORUS, INC. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:07 am
United States is a classification case from the U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 11:23 am
The sections on what constitutes a search are updated with cases like United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:25 pm
Due to shipping considerations, you must have a valid United States address. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:19 am
This week’s hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:27 pm
See, e.g., O’Donnell v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:57 pm
Further, the the Supreme Court of United States declined hearing the case, because the court determined that such a law did not violate the federal Commerce Clause. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
