Search for: "State v. General Development Corp."
Results 1241 - 1260
of 3,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Prior to 1952, the State Department generally requested immunity “in all actions against friendly sovereigns. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
: District Court Delaware dismisses lawsuit by Pernod Ricard against Bacardi (IP tango) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s CRASH DUMMIES no abandonment decision: Mattel, Inc v The Crash Dummy Movie (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 14: Noncommercial use defense to a dilution claim unavailable in a TTAB proceeding: American Express Marketing & Development Corp v Gilad Development Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no… [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
We hold that (1) the developer agreed to arbitrate its claims against the general contractor and the general contractor did not waive its right to demand arbitration; (2) the developer's argument that a contractual deadline bars the general contractor's demand for arbitration is itself a claim that must be arbitrated; (3) the developer did not agree in the general contract to arbitrate its claims against the other defendants;… [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:04 pm
" Hottel Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
United States, 2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:14 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US: CAFC debates whether claim term ‘animal’ includes humans: Martek Biosciences Corp v Nutrinova, Inc (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) General USPTO-Pfizer workshop on IP & innovation in Mumbai (Intellectual Property Watch) Australia: Full Federal Court… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 9:51 am
In Khan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:50 pm
Co v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 12:33 pm
”Ormco Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:06 am
In Lindo v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
Chevron Corp., 73 A.3d 934 (Del. [read post]
12 Jun 2006, 4:54 am
The Judiciary is particularly ill suited to make such decisions, as “courts are fundamentally underequipped to formulate national policies or develop standards for matters not legal in nature. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:53 am
While Director Hinman acknowledges that digital assets are “simply code,” and not inherently securities, he looks towards Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
New York State Urban Development Corp., 892 N.Y.S.2d 8, 28 (N.Y. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Mason, 527 F.3d 252, 255 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
