Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 61,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2007, 8:29 am
Just last week in ACLU v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:27 am
”) State of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The Court further held that states can avoid free riders through less restrictive means than the imposition of agency fees. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:24 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The holding of the case, Obergefell et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The holding of the case, Obergefell et al. v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm
The fact that the future sentence has not yet been imposed means that information will often be lacking, and that in turn means that the exercise of such authority would risk confusion and error. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
Today’s Decision of the Day is Vartanian v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am
What This Means for Employers. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:28 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Monday in Allen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:18 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am
Supreme Court announced its decision today in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:33 am
Regina (McGetrick) v Parole Board and another [2012] EWHC 882 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 114 “When considering and making its substantive recommendation on the question of the early release or recall of prisoners on licence following a reference to it by the Secretary of State for Justice, the Parole Board was ‘dealing with the case’ within the meaning of section 239(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and was therefore required to consider all the documents… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
‘Member State’ shall mean a Member State of the European Union. 3. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:00 pm
Chang v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
The State’s reduction of its employer contribution for health insurance premiums for judges was an unconstitutional diminution of judicial compensationBransten v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 03214, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSitting and retired members of the New York State Judiciary challenged the State’s recent decrease in its employer contribution to the cost of the judges' health insurance premiums, contending that it… [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:25 am
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice (JUSTICE and another intervening); In re MacDermott’s and McCartney’s Applications for Judicial Review (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 18; [2011] WLR (D) 155 “A miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, occurred where a new fact so undermined the evidence against the defendant that no conviction could possibly be based upon it. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 6:03 am
Court of Appeals agreed, and in Tyrone Jackson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
” Miller v. [read post]
