Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2010, 4:47 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am
Sara Poli, University of SouthamptonAlessandra Arcuri, Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law Financial Contracts and ‘Junk Bonds’ Purchases in the Italian Legal System: A Matter of (In)Correct Disclosure Cristina Amato, University of Brescia Legal Education in Italy Vittoria Barsotti, University of FlorenceVincenzo Varano, University of Florence Italian Report on Insurance Law between Business Law and Consumer Law… [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:23 pm
Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The company also failed to treat the sludge to reduce pathogens and maintain records at its land application site at the Doe Run Desloge Mine Tailings Site in Desloge, Mo. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm
Indeed, the individual right arguments were so strong that when the Supreme Court finally got around to announcing a new Second Amendment decision, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
British Columbia (Transportation and Highways). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
., Vice President at Large of The Washington Post, and Michael Schudson, a Professor at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, have advocated the creation of a “Fund for Local News” that “would make grants for advances in local news reporting and innovative ways to support it. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Pontifical Catholic University Services Ass’n, 357 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2004) (dismissing suit as “not a plausible antitrust case”); Farm Credit Services v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:45 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
” He declined to say whether he still does. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:18 am
Separately, from Columbia University’s Axel Patents: Technology Transfer and Implications for the Bayh-Dole Act :Although the Cohen-Boyer and Axel patents are sometimes cited as exemplars of Bayh-Dole, the first of the Cohen-Boyer patents had been granted ten days before the Bayh-Dole Act passed in Congress, on December 2, [1980] and Columbia had applied for the first Axel patent ten months before Bayh-Dole was enacted. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 7:25 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case Pennington v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Major ACTA leak: Internet and civil enforcement chapters with country positions (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (The Gray Blog) District Court N D California: Dancing tot prevails over UMG in YouTube fair use case: Lenz Blog v Universal Music Group (Ars Technica) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (IP Directions) Global Global… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Major ACTA leak: Internet and civil enforcement chapters with country positions (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (The Gray Blog) District Court N D California: Dancing tot prevails over UMG in YouTube fair use case: Lenz Blog v Universal Music Group (Ars Technica) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (IP Directions) Global Global… [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
The first adopter of the neutral citation was the Superior Courts of British Columbia. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:29 am
Scott Hemphill (Columbia University - Law School) has posted Deciding Who Decides Intellectual Property Appeals on SSRN. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:51 am
Gluck (Columbia University - Columbia Law School) has posted Consensus Textualism: States as Statutory Interpretation Laboratories (Yale Law Journal, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
A few weeks ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in The University of South Carolina v. the University of Southern California in South Carolina’s appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). [read post]
