Search for: "Doe v. United States of America" Results 1261 - 1280 of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Again, whether or not this relationship created an appearance of impropriety is less important than the fact that a standard so uniformly used across America's judicial landscape does not even apply to the Justices. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This is a provocative claim, for unlike pensions, debt relief does not require the disbursement of benefits directly to citizens. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court Justice William Johnson, Jr. who described the Constitution as a “tripartite contract among the people, the states, and the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am by Steve Baird
Thanks to District Court Judge Joan Ericksen of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, next week NeoCon attendees will be able to see and experience both SEEYOND and BEYOND products, without likely confusion, when she confirmed last week in a written order her previous oral denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Verscene Inc. and Seeyond Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 554 U.S. 237, 244–45 (2008); El Paso, 526 U.S. at 479. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:04 am
Asset Marketing Inc., No. 05-CV-00633 (S.D.Cal.), filed in March 2005, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, and certified as a state-wide class action (covering a class that “partially overlaps the Negrete class”) in July 2006; Mooney v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 10:43 am by Christopher Porter, Klara Jordan
The United States still struggles to find effective policies for deterring cyberattacks. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm by Stephen Gottlieb
[vii] Truly this Court does not believe in democracy, self-government or in the America that would run them. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Article II, Section I explains “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America,” and no one else. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am by Glenn
They’re just not an antitrust violation in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm by Ronald Mann
Apparently putting the nail in the coffin, Justice Scalia turned the discussion to the interests of the United States as creditor – parroting the argument of the Solicitor General that approving the debtor’s plan here would prejudice the United States when it appears as a creditor – because of its general inability to advance funds to bid in a bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:58 am by Charles Sartain
Co. a United States District Court considered the circumstances under which a lessor can withold its consent to assign an oil and gas lease. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]