Search for: "Mrs. Occupant"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 11:25 am
Mr Kelly was sent away. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
No consideration was given as to the nature of our client’s occupation or of the agreement entered into with our client and her grandmother sufficient to assess whether Mrs May had occupied premises at William Cook Road as settled intervening accommodation. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:41 pm
A contractual licence would not be an interest in land, no matter what the term, so not a ‘material interest’, so the tenant would only be liable when in occupation. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 3:36 pm
She lists her occupation as ‘Barrister’. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:23 pm
Mr M ran an accountancy business. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
Mr & Mrs P had an assured shorthold. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:40 am
This too was personally served on Mr Lasrado. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:40 am
This too was personally served on Mr Lasrado. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Here Mrs Doran, via Mr Berkley QC, argued that: Gateway (b) had been widened in Doherty such that the personal circumstances and history of occupation of Mrs Doran were factors that should be considered both the the Council in deciding to issue an NTQ and by the Court in considering whether the Council’s decision was one that a reasonable person would consider justified. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 9:40 am
My heartfelt sympathies go out to the loved ones mourning the loss of Mr. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:58 am
You can watch and listen to the speech here and below is a transcription of Mr. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:48 pm
Mr. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:44 am
Mrs. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am
Mrs. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm
Mr. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:22 pm
Mr. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:13 pm
There were other issues in the case that assisted the defense, in that the defendant was not intoxicated, but Mr. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:11 pm
Mr. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:17 pm
Mr. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
Second, the claim on behalf of Mr Coombes (who had lived in the property for 56 years and was now the subject of a notice to quit after the death of his Mum, the successor to the tenancy) was not just based on a gateway (a) challenge to section 3, PEA 1977, but on the statutory scheme (sections 21, 87 and 89, Housing Act 1985) which lead to LBWF seeking to terminate Mr Coombes’ occupation through section 3. [read post]
