Search for: "Williams v. Office of Public Defender"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
The panel also ruled that an improper motive for a challenge by one attorney out of several in a multi-defendant case can be enough to violate the principle of Batson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
In Morris v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
Dunn and McGrain v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Rayburn House Office Building. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Carnegie Endowment President William J. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
Indeed, in my view the plaintiffs have alleged that the defendants engaged in a classic type of conspiracy, namely, combining together to drive a business competitor and their novel business model out of the marketplace. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
The administration didn’t publish the list even after then-Secretary of Defense William Cohen assured then-Rep. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:52 am
Whitaker v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
Powell, Jr., Chief Justice William H. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Fourth, what is to be made of statements by Attorney General William Barr and U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:31 pm
Chief Justice William Taft’s opinion of the Court reasoned: “The language of the amendment cannot be extended and expanded to include telephone wires, reaching to the whole world from the defendant’s house or office. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
’” William J. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
A certification by a director or officer adopting a written plan for trading securities that he or she is unaware of material non-public information at the time of its adoption and is adopting the plan in good faith and not to evade the prohibitions of Rule 10b5-1. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm
Among other things, executive privilege doesn’t apply to conduct predating the president’s time in office, and it also could not be used to decline to answer questions about matters on the public record. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The Court had asked for briefing on whether Jackson should be overturned in the context of Montejo v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
This is true whether the parties are public or private: a judge may not be compensated out of the fines he collects from defendants he convicts, and private residents may not exercise zoning power over their neighbors. [read post]
