Search for: "EMPLOYEE DOE 5"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 16,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2013, 6:56 am
First, Colorado law, CRS Sec. 8-73-108(5)(e)(IX.5), plainly recognizes an employer’s right to conduct drug testing. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:53 pm
Code §22-5-3-2, by filing the lawsuit. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 7:27 am
One day in 2012 after working as a “temporary employee” for about 5 years, he was called into the break room to fill out paperwork but it wasn’t to hire him on as a full-time employee. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:19 am
Id. at 5. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 1:14 pm
On May 5, 2021, Gov. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
How does the CEO Pay Ratio Rule work? [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm
How Does This Affect My Company? [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 2:42 pm
However, the Trump administration has taken a different stance, arguing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not provide any explicit or implied protection to either gay or transgender employees. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 7:37 am
If you wouldn't say something to someone's face then you shouldn't be posting it online. 5. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:00 pm
If the employee can demonstrate that the other reason is a mere pretext, then it does not qualify as another valid reason and it would still be considered wrongful termination. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 1:57 pm
Does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:14 am
Mission in Hong Kong or Immediate Family 101(a)(27)(D)Section 152 of the Immigration Act of 1990 SF1 Certain Former Employees of the Panama Canal Company or Canal Zone Government 101(a)(27) (E) SF2 Spouse or Child of SF1 101(a)(27) (E) SG1 Certain Former Employees of the U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 2:46 pm
Yes, but that exception does not apply to the SBIR and STTR Programs. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
Honeywell Int’l, Inc., Case No. 5:12-CV-1766 (LEK/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
Honeywell Int’l, Inc., Case No. 5:12-CV-1766 (LEK/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:23 am
What does it mean to cause employees to work seven days? [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
We hold that after-acquired expert evidence that there were no adverse consequences from an employee’s failure to perform does not create a triable issue of fact on the question whether the employee failed to perform his or her job duties and thus has limited relevance, if any, to the question of discrimination. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 8:09 am
Thus, the allegation is that the workers were not paid for the time; the claim is that these training modules could take 4-5 hours to complete. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
The SEC claimed that Strickland, while an employee at GE Capital Corp. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:56 am
Just as the Company does not tolerate use of race-, religion-, or gender-based slurs in the workplace, an employee’s use of such slurs in cyberspace will be grounds for immediate termination. [read post]
