Search for: "In Re Adoption of G." Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract:      Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:06 am
(g) The board of governors * * * shall adopt such guidelines and standards as may be necessary and appropriate for the operation of programs under this Part, […] (emphasis added) The introductory paragraph of the “Standards and Guidelines”, confirms that these are indeed the guidelines and standards mandated by 22 NYCRR 137.3(g) (quoted above). [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:54 pm by FDABlog HPM
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in In Re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation, Case Nos. 10-2077, 10-2078, 10-2079. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:47 am by Jack D
La dernière proposition de loi en date, déposée il y a seulement quelques jours par la députée Marin, fait clairement exception. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
Although child support arrears cease to accrue above the sum of $500 where a noncustodial parent can establish that his or her income is less than or equal to poverty income guidelines amount for a single person, as reported by the United States Department of Health and Human Services (see Family Ct Act 413[1][g] ), a "modification, set aside or vacatur [of a child support obligation set forth in a judgment or order] shall not reduce or annul child support arrears accrued prior to the… [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sometime in 2007, B360 released its first podcast of a cooking show, Bitchin’ Kitchen, hosted by Nadia Giosia as Nadia G. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:10 pm
 Wife filed three OSC re Contempts against the Husband, including one in which the Court in August, 2006, ordered the parties to meet and confer in a 4-way, as to which Ken "refused to meet and confer if attorney Andrew G. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:18 am by The Legal Blog
The High Court would not, therefore, for the purpose of certiorari assign to itself the role of an Appellate Court and step into re-appreciating or evaluating the evidence and substitute its own findings in place of those arrived at by the inferior court.In Nagendra Nath Bora & Anr. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:32 am by Rosalind English
The Tribunal concluded that the Charity’s proposed approach was inconsistent with the authority of Re G in which it was confirmed that the interests of the child required the door to be opened “as wide as reasonably possible” . [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:36 pm by Ryan Radia
It’s odd that Facebook hasn’t adopted an online counter notification system, especially given that service providers are shielded from liability if they respond to counter notices in accordance with section 512(g). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm by PaulKostro
NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Stefanie Levine
Radio Eng'g Labs., Inc., 293 U.S. 1 (1934) (RCA), with its broad language seemingly supporting a heightened standard of proof in all cases challenging patent validity. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Stefanie Levine
Radio Eng'g Labs., Inc., 293 U.S. 1 (1934) (RCA), with its broad language seemingly supporting a heightened standard of proof in all cases challenging patent validity. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm by Sara Liss
  And if you’re thinking, ‘that’s what she said,’ sorry, but you’re an idiot. [read post]