Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
’s handgun ban would fail ‘[u]nder any of the standards of scrutiny.'” So the 2nd Circuit proceeded to Step 2 of Marzzarella: apply some form of heightened scrutiny. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
And is incoherently applied in the U of Ala. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 7:22 am
I recently wrote about Katz v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:29 am
” Bailey v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
U. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
While Public Resources Code § 21061 – a general definitional statute not cited by OPR in support of its proposal – defines an EIR as “a detailed statement setting forth the matters specified in Sections 21100 and 21100.1[,]” this general reference is of unclear import and per CEQA’s own terms governs “[u]nless the context otherwise requires. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
The jury was discharged after counsel’s closing speeches because the plaintiff’s counsel had, contrary to the judge’s earlier rulings, mentioned damages figures to the jury. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
The court said that “The record is clear that [Murray] was deprived of her substantial rights in the review process culminating in her U-rating when measured against the methodology followed in other such case, citing Cohn v Board of Education, 102 AD3d 586. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:59 am
Let’s be very clear. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
S. v. [read post]
Beecher-Monas Proposes to Abandon Common Sense, Science, and Expert Witnesses for Specific Causation
11 Sep 2015, 3:23 pm
It is not all about putting a DSM-V diagnosis on the chart, and prescribing medication. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:29 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:29 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:28 am
The facts in Shapiro v Ettenson, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 16, 2015], are fairly simple. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Plains Pipeline, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
In other words, the government's ability to conduct a warrantless follow-up search of this kind is expressly limited by the scope of the initial private search. [read post]
