Search for: "Bruce v State" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
I ran into this dilemma the other day when discussing the classic case of Moore v. [read post]
Because the juvenile is Indian by blood and easily meets three of the most important fac tors used to evaluate tribal recognition laid  out in  United States v Bruce,  394 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2005), he is an “Indian” under 1153, and we uphold his conviction. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The petitioners have pulled together an experienced legal team, including Lord Anthony Gifford, counsel to the landmark case of Dudgeon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The application, Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:14 am by CJLF Staff
In the ruling, the state Supreme Court upheld the death penalty for Abraham Sanchez Jr., who had challenged the timing and use of the jury in adjudicating his claim of death penalty ineligibility under Atkins v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:14 pm
In this judgment, the Honourable Madame Justice Bruce stated that “there is a qualitative difference between managing one’s business affairs and attending to one’s daily care needs and choosing who among family members one wishes to have in charge of those matters. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]