Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 15,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2007, 1:58 pm
US v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:03 am
Anthony Wasylina v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:16 am
Here, wife obtained physical custody of the child, which seemed to be an important outcome for her, only to end up loosing custody and owing six-figure legal fees to the husband. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:53 pm
State Public Works Board. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:33 pm
See Romer v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:15 am
Adding to this omission is the failure to explain to viewers that abortion is not in fact protected, even under Roe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:03 pm
ZERO MEAT v MEAT ZERO Background On 29 September 2021, CPF Food and Beverage Co., Ltd. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
The issue between the parties was whether the figure of £90 (as inflated) should be read as a fixed amount, or as an upper limit or cap. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:37 am
Although the appellant in Fidel Quintanilla v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:12 pm
I have today’s transcript from oral argument before the Supreme Court in Marx v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:20 am
Blehm v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:30 am
So I can see where the trial court's coming from.For this reason, were I writing the opinion -- or were I the San Diego Superior Court figuring out how to respond to the Court of Appeal's ruling -- I think I'd suggest a simple solution. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:46 am
Today, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames v Moss (2019) EWHC 3261 (Ch) Ever since Jones v London Borough of Southwark (2016) EWHC 457 (Ch) (our report), the position on water rates taken as rent by a number of London Councils and Housing Associations under agreements with Thames Water has been conflicted. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:48 pm
Here it was at 11pm: I thought of trying to get one of the first-come, first-served seats provided to members of the Supreme Court bar, but I figure it’s a lot of lost sleep for 20 minutes of sparks given that we’ll get the transcript anyway. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 10:36 am
I've figured out who the heroes are. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:40 am
On appeal from: 2013 EWCA Crim 1104 The Supreme Court, by a majority of 3:2, allowed the appeal concerning whether VAT, paid or accounted for to HMRC, should be discounted when calculating the benefit figure to be confiscated under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 1:59 pm
Locke v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:46 am
By Eric Goldman Zango has filed its reply brief in Zango v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:50 pm
Hard to say, also, that judicial elections categorically don't figure into cases like this one. [read post]
