Search for: "California v. Harris"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Harris, Book Note, Reviewing Roger I. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
” As noted above, the Seventh Circuit in Judge v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Harris, Michael Ray. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Ohio, Miranda v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
And, most famously, in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
Appointed by President Harry Truman, she served on the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At the Daily Journal (subscription required), David Boyle looks at National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
Harris. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:03 pm
Wade and Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(University of Chicago)Hansen Lars (University of Chicago)Harris Milton (University of Chicago)Hart Oliver (Harvard University)Hazlett Thomas W. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
” Later, in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 5:32 am
Justice Harry A. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In Aguila-Montes de Oca, the court said the California burglary statute, which was too broad to constitute generic burglary within the federal definition, could be treated as a “crime of violence” under § 1326 by examining statements made during court proceedings to narrow the statute to the generic definition of burglary; that is, although the statute did not require unlawful entry, the sentencing court could examine other material to discover whether the defendant broke… [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
At the same time, though, it should be noted that Harlan sharply dissented when the Supreme Court refused to grant civil rights protections to Chinese victims of white vigilantes in California. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Transportation Agency (1987)), and treat pregnant women more favorably than non-pregnant employees (California Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]