Search for: "Hughes v. State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There was an Inforrm post by Hugh Tomlinson QC dealing with this contribution to the debate. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
Punitive damages can, for example, be awarded in defamation cases in the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:17 pm
Bowers cites to the case of Ellerbe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In October of this past year, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:08 am
The appellate court's decision in the case of Courvoisier Courts, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
The appellate court's decision in the case of Courvoisier Courts, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
” In re Baker Hughes, Inc., 215 F.3d 1297, 1301 (Fed. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 11:04 am
Contrast Effie Film, LLC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
On 12 December 2012, the Court of Appeal (Arden and Lloyd-Jones LJJ and Tugendhat J) handed down judgment in Cammish v Hughes ([2012] EWCA Civ 1655). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
See, e.g., Zach Hughes, “The Legal Significance of Statistical Significance,” 28 Westlaw Journal: Pharmaceutical 1, 2 (Mar. 2012) (erroneously describing the meaning and function of significance testing; “Stated simply, a statistically significant confidence interval helps ensure that the findings of a particular study are not due to chance or some other confounding factors. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
In Copyright and Incomplete Historiographies: Of Piracy, Propertization, and Thomas Jefferson, Justin Hughes traces the ”robust history of copyright being referred to as ‘property. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
In today's ruling the court (Lords Justices Lewison -- who is a former Patents Court judge -- Etherton and Hughes) allowed M&S's appeal. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
What about the now-late Brett Hartman, or the even more recently late Preston Hughes? [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 1:34 pm
Nov. 22, 2012 Hughes, J.)Polacheck v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:21 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:21 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:53 am
Additional decisions following Zhang include: Hughes v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
(Counsel in black robes preparing for Supreme Court oral argument - with apologies to the IPKat)All eyes will be on the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) on Monday, October 29, 2012 when it will hear oral argument in the immensely important case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, a company that licensed films challenged the collection of state taxes on the gross receipts of royalties from its licenses.8 The company argued that its copyrights were “instrumentalities” of the federal government and, thus, immune from state taxation. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
