Search for: "State v. Arthur" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 8:44 pm
  But it was entered in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 6:22 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  In a recent ruling on February 9, 2012, the Texas Court of Appeals awarded a lodestar enhancement in Stratton v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
What will America become if, as reported, the five most conservative members of the US Supreme Court angrily and emphatically overrule Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]