Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 15,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
This ensures stability of legal relations, because it means that a matter which has been definitely settled by judicial decision cannot be referred to the courts by different parties for reconsideration. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:01 pm
The DOJ announced today that Maximus has agreed to pay $30.5 Million to settle qui tam lawsuit. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 10:58 pm
Under the revision, even if a federal judge thinks the state court conviction was unconstitutional, the defendant can still lose if the state appeals courts did not unreasonably apply settled constitutional standards.The case is Dunlap v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:26 am
In Miller v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
Brooks v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 3:34 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
In Levine v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:16 pm
United States, 503 F.3d 1266 (Fed. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
Juvera v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:09 am
Leslie v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 8:27 am
On August 23, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its long-awaited opinion in Klocke v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm
Supreme Court set out in Travelers Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:46 am
Racky Ramchair certainly did.The case is Ramchair v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 3:40 am
It is settled law that that removal of children should usually be effected pursuant to an Emergency Protection Order (EPO), and that section 46 should only be used where it is not practicable to execute an EPO (Langley -v- Liverpool City Council). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:39 pm
In Lafarge North America, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:03 pm
Scott v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:11 am
United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm
She paid twice to settle that case but not before an appeals court ruled that denial of her anti-SLAPP motion was proper. [read post]