Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 1341 - 1360 of 3,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen discusses “the notorious ‘cake case,’” Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Pearson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Ultimately, the court says that lesser mental states do not support a finding of contributory liability. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 10:08 am
On the other hand, given the way Risk handled coverage of the "sovereign immunity issue" in Sistrunk v United States of America I am not at all surprised. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . must be stated with particularity’ ” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
 It reinstated that “genericide” does not occur “until the trademark has gone so far toward becoming the exclusive descriptor of the product that sellers of competing brands cannot compete effectively without using the name” TY Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:42 am by paperstreet
In Bilski, the Court considered claims covering a process for hedging risks of price changes by, for example, contracting to purchase commodities from sellers at a fixed price, reflecting the desire of sellers to hedge against a drop in prices, while selling commodities to consumers at a fixed price, reflecting the desire of consumers to hedge against a price increase. p. 5; Bilski v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 4:36 pm
Kudos again to Matt who is one of the few factoring companies that stands up and is not afraid to state what is that they actually do. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 11:11 am by Patricia Salkin
  Discovery Builders, Inc. v City of Oakland, 2023 WL 4115074 (CA App. 6/22/2023). [read post]