Search for: "State v. G. N."
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2014, 12:05 pm
JANIS, JONATHAN N. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 11:57 am
In Rankin Construction Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 1:13 am
Hafner-Burton and David G. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Miaoulis & N. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
”Citing Matter of N. v Novello, 13 AD3d 631, the Appellate Division explained that where, as here, "the relevance of the subpoena is challenged, it is incumbent upon the issuer to come forward with a factual basis establishing the relevance of the documents sought to the investigation" to show "that the material sought bears a reasonable relation to the matter under investigation. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
History Med. 3, 27 & n.88-92 (2003). [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
Darue Eng’g. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 6:16 pm
E.g., Exxon Research & Eng’g Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(o) All property in this State of the judgment debtor where the judgment is in favor of any state for failure to pay that state’s income tax on benefits received from a pension or other retirement plan. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(o) All property in this State of the judgment debtor where the judgment is in favor of any state for failure to pay that state’s income tax on benefits received from a pension or other retirement plan. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
BootsDeckers Outdoor Corporation v J.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
Katfriends Morag MacDonald (Bird & Bird, left), Richard Vary (Nokia), Sally Field (Bristows) and the eponymous Mehmet Gün are there too, not to mention EPLAW Honorary President Pierre Véron, Margot Fröhlinger (all the way from Eponia), knowledgeable Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), the dashing Justin Turner QC and, well, you can see for yourself who else is there ... [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
P., V. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:17 am
In Arban v West Publ’g Corp, the Sixth Circuit held “the right to non-interference with medical leave . . . is not absolute. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 10:53 am
The Board’s decision in Matter of A-R-C-G, 26 I&N Dec. 388 (BIA 2014) held that “married women in Guatemala who are unable to leave their relationship,” constitute a legally cognizable “particular social group,” (PGS.) and under the right circumstances, could be considered refugees and granted asylum in the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
[Brief text begins:] ISSUES PRESENTED This Court has solicited amicus briefs on the following two questions: Whether G. [read post]
