Search for: "United States v. James Read" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2020, 11:40 am by sydniemery
United States: CSLI, Third-Party Doctrine, and Privacy in the Twenty-first Century 14 Liberty U. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:21 am by Susan Brenner
The United States Supreme Court has said, the plain view doctrine may `not be used to extend a general exploratory search from one object to another until something incriminating at last emerges. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
United States President Biden has signed an Executive Order implementing an EU-US data privacy framework for transferring data. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” At the birth of the United States, copyright was couched in terms of property more often that not. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 1:55 am by INFORRM
United States Amended versions of the proposed Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act — also known as COPPA 2.0 — and the Kids Online Safety Act were approved for House f [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Having chosen to keep my judgments implicit, I was gratified to read Justice Breyer’s insightful contribution. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am by SHG
The case helped bring an end to the death penalty in New York and was cited by the United States Supreme Court in the 1966 Miranda v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
  For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19]  Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one… [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Moreover, the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement approved the procedures after it conducted an independent review of the treatment, including review from a nurse and an independent doctor. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:57 am
” “FDR did not hesitate long over a 1937 Supreme Court opinion (United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]