Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2010, 10:42 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Footnote 95 and 96 made it clear that the applicable time period to determine whether the pre-suit demand requirement was futile was when the first derivative claim was presented--which was in the second amended complaint. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:41 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Parks, 1 S.W.3d 96, 100 (Tex. 1999); Koelsch, 132 S.W.3d at 497. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 12:56 pm by Bill Marler
 CDC does not use the term “elevated blood lead levels” when recommending what actions to take based on a child’s blood lead level (BLL). [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm by admin
Clifford,[1] is a useful counterweight to the shrill agnotologists, Robert Proctor, Naomi Oreskes, and David Michaels. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 8:11 pm by Schachtman
  The study reported a non-statistically significant standardized incidence ratio for all cancer, of either 1.10 (95% CI 0·98–1·25), with a comparison group of the generalized U.S. male population, or 1·19 (95% CI 0·961·47), with unexposed firefighters as a comparison group, and corrected for possible surveillance bias. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
Suspension of your driver’s license of 1 year. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm by Schachtman
Clifford,[1] is a useful counterweight to the shrill agnotologists, Robert Proctor, Naomi Oreskes, and David Michaels. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
Suspension of your driver’s license of 1 year. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Schechter, Geographic Trademarks and the Protection of Competitor Communication, 96 Trademark Rep. 782, 784 (2006). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
A New York Estate Lawyer said this was a proceeding brought before the Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County, for the accounting of AFS, as administrator c.t.a. of the estate of WPS. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
 There, as Case C 96/09 P Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Budějovický Budvar, described by the IPKat here, they were unceremoniously tossed back to the General Court for its further attention. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This harmless misstatement does not rescue the relevant claims from a best mode violation. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:57 pm by Robert P. Merten III and Mike Le
”2 After initial briefs were submitted from both California and Arizona, the court invited the U.S. solicitor general to express the views of the United States on the matter.3 The U.S. solicitor general filed an amicus curiae brief strongly urging the court to deny Arizona’s motion because the dispute does not warrant the court’s exercise of original jurisdiction, which it says should be exercised only sparingly.4 In response, Arizona filed a supplemental brief contending… [read post]