Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 11:14 pm
§ 112, ¶ 1. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:29 pm
§ 112, ¶ 1. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
However, provisions of the ADAAA that took effect January 1, 2009 change the way that these statutor [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
§ 1514A(a)(1). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:02 pm
According to the Field Assistance Bulletin, the regulation does not require that a plan have a particular number of “designated investment alternative” (DIA), and the Bulletin does not prohibit the use of a platform or a brokerage window, self-directed brokerage account, or similar plan arrangement in an individual account plan. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
In its letter, the applicant explicitly stated that “To the best of my knowledge, the electronic form of the sequence listing corresponds to the printed form, and it does not include matter which goes beyond the content of the application as filed”. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 1:39 am
FEEDBACK Newsletter #1. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
Nor does such interference automatically follow either from the fact that some of the directors of that company are connected to it by employment contracts or by a contract for the supply of services (para. 83). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:31 am
" Ex parte Jackson, 96 U.S. 727, 733, 24 L. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:23 pm
(Does Anthony Weiner come to mind for anyone?) [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
1. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
96/09 P Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
State, 763 So.2d 1094, 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).Relief SoughtPetitioner requests the issuance of a writ of prohibition that: (1) quashes the order setting this cause for retrial; (2) prohibits the trial court from retrying Petitioner and (3) forever discharges Petitioner for the crimes charged. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
Does it license the medication if the sponsor’s trial comes close to 5%, or does it demand 5%, two-tailed, as a minimal showing? [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
At the outset, this Court notes that the advisory opinions of the Committee on Open Government (which were inconsistent here and upon which both sides thus rely to various extents) are “neither binding upon the agency nor entitled to greater deference in an article 78 proceeding than is the construction of the agency” itself (John P. v Whalen, 54 NY2d 89, 96 [1981]; see Buffalo News v Buffalo Enter. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:25 pm
Ask them, (1) What did we do well? [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:46 am
That order obviously does not finally decide the substantive issue affecting the appellant and the respondent Cavell, because it does not approve the scheme of arrangement. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
This does not make the Chief Justice unique as a Supreme Court Justice—far from it. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:58 pm
Slip op. at 1. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
Mauritian law does not provide for a default statutory matrimonial property regime. [read post]
