Search for: "State v. Strange"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am
He rightly criticizes the post-1960's judicial fabrication of an injury-in-fact requirement, and he thinks the Court went wrong in the 1970's with cases like United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In a rather strange case, Stanley v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 12:05 pm
Archer & White Sales Inc. and Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:47 am
ShareDuring Tuesday’s argument in Santos-Zacaria v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:11 am
Gentry v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 9:21 am
In the McIntosh v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), PLIVA v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 12:37 pm
This could result in the strange outcome of Title V permits that are virtually blank because those sources have very little other applicable air pollution regulations. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
The Supreme Court's ruling this past summer in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 10:37 pm
For instance, the Microsoft v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
In Tuesday’s argument in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:36 am
The Supreme Court granted cert. today in a case, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
Now, comments Merpel, recusal applications are strange things. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 6:01 pm
As stated by Newton J.A., the judge of first instance, Dr. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:19 pm
For example, in Marison v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 1:30 pm
James Pfander about Department of State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 10:37 pm
New York Yankees Partnership v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 11:32 am
People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:50 am
As to first-party claims, this language preempts any decision by the Florida Supreme Court on this issue currently pending before them in QBE Insurance Corp. v. [read post]
