Search for: "B H
v.
Review Board"
Results 121 - 140
of 550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
AMA Provision H-265.993, concerning “Peer Review of Medical Expert Witness Testimony,” states that:[15] “AMA policy is that: (1) the giving of medico-legal testimony by a physician expert witness be considered the practice of medicine, and (2) all medico-legal expert witness testimony given by a physician should be subject to peer review. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
B. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 7:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Aloys Hüttermann explores the parallels between patents and literature: Do patents and literature have something in common? [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
ResQNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
June 2015) (non-precedential) This case involved the review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of a Chinese national for withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture (CAT). [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
David Mayer Naman brought action against the Board of Appeal’s decision before the General Court, asserting the violation of Article 54(2), Article 57(2) and (3) and Article 8(1)(b) of the CTMR. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
| L'Oréal v RN Ventures: exclusive licence registration and costs recovery | Eighth Granted Petition for Review | In Memoriam Trevor Baylis: the life-saving wind-up radio and the precarious lot of the sole inventor Never Too Late 185 [week ending 4 March] Exclusive interview with Johanne Bélisle, Chief Executive Officer of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office| Patents and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
(By William H. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:06 am
In re H (A Minor) (Abduction: Rights of Custody), [2000] 2 A.C. 291, 1999 WL 1319095 (appeal taken from Eng.); see Fawcett v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:55 pm
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v Board of Zoning Appeals of Nashville & Davidson County, 2014 WL 5147757 (TN App. 10/13/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Signs [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
The Board also acted arbitrarily and capriciously in altering the audit standards for Music Choice. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm
§ 215.1(b). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
See Brett H. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:43 am
William H. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
” It posited the following series of events: “A school board president announces at a school board meeting that the board has lifted pandemic-era restrictions on public schools,” and, later, “at a backyard barbecue with friends whose children attend public schools,” shares the identical information. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
Brockler gave his file to Filiatraut, reviewed the case with him, and attended a pretrial conference with him. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
Corner Post sought review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm
Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 v. [read post]
