Search for: "Borden v. Case" Results 121 - 140 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Dennis Crouch
The case under scrutiny is LKQ Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:02 am by Alessandro Cerri
 Accordingly, the passing off claim also failed, and Thatchers' case was dismissed accordingly. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Some exhibits (e.g. the original fabric from the leading non-identical artistic work infringement decision in Designers Guild v Russell Williams, which this Kat has still never seen) are going to be kept but others -- including the photos of the jif lemon and Borden ReaLemon in Reckitt & Colman v Borden) are going to be ditched, if they haven't already. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
"(See, also, Jankowski v Borden's Condensed Milk Co., 176 AD 453 [2d Dept 1917] [Driver's statement that it was his fault held not admissible]; and Raczes v Home, 68 AD3d 1521, 1522-1523 [3d Dept 2009] [Maintenance worker's statement: "This is the third time that I fixed this railing and I'm getting sick of it", not competent to establish notice on the part of employer]). [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1331 "exists when `a well-pleaded complaint establishes either that federal law creates the cause of action or that the plaintiff's right to relief necessarily depends on resolution of a substantial question of federal law.'" Borden v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
" The "Jif" lemon from Reckitt and Coleman v Borden The Supreme Court had to decide if the judge had erred on a point of law. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
" The "Jif" lemon from Reckitt and Coleman v Borden The Supreme Court had to decide if the judge had erred on a point of law. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:45 am
The case is McCambridge Limited v Joseph Brennan Bakeries [2012] IESC 46, for which there is a majority decision (here) and a dissenting judgment (here). [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
’  The classic action of passing off is based on the trinity of (i) goodwill, (ii) misrepresentation to the public, and (iii) damage to the claimant, as was reaffirmed in the 'Jif Lemon' case (Reckitt & Colman Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] UKHL 12). [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:03 pm
Perhaps the most similar case in Canada is Pacific Northwest Herb Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:03 am
”The decision references a number of relevant cases, including the New Brunswick Court of Appeal’s 1983 ruling in Federal Business Development Bank v. [read post]