Search for: "Doe v. Epstein" Results 121 - 140 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
Epstein, 516 U.S. 367 (1996), was eliminated in copyright infringement actions by 17 USC 411 (a). [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 7:46 am
  However, the Court noted that its decision "does not foreclose the possibility that there may be an implied statutory duty of care arising out of the statuory scheme." [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [he] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:18 am by Robin Fretwell Wilson
The question is whether the other three doctors—Doe 2, Doe 5, and Doe 6—can obtain the necessary admitting privileges. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Mass. 1997)(occupational epidemiology of benzene exposure and benzene does not inform health effects from vanishingly low exposure to benzene in bottled water) Whiting v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
, 115 PENN STATE LAW REVIEW 341 (2010)Marc Edelman, Does the NBA still have “market power? [read post]