Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
The New York State Department of Financial Services [DFS] asked the Civil Service Commission [Commission] to jurisdictionally classify the titles of Director, Financial Services Programs 1 and 2, positions in the noncompetitive class with a "policy-influencing" designation pursuant to §42[2-a] of the Civil Service Law.* DFS also sought to have certain vacant noncompetitive investigative positions given "title changes" to the titles of Investigator 1 and… [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:15 am
IRC § 71 [9] “Alimony and separate maintenance payments” was repealed. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:15 am
IRC § 71 [9] “Alimony and separate maintenance payments” was repealed. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:46 am
(b) Is the repair clause set out in Article 14 of Directive 98/71 and Article 110 of Regulation ... 6/2002 to be interpreted as constituting a subjective right for third-party producers of replacement parts and accessories and, if so, does that subjective right include the right for such third parties to use the trade mark registered by another party in respect of replacement parts and accessories, by way of derogation from the rules laid down in Regulation ... 207/2009 and… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:01 am
Therefore, the lump-sum payment does not meet one of the factors of § 71(b)(1) of the Code that requires no such designation of the payment in the divorce or separation instrument in order to meet the definition of alimony or separate maintenance payment for purposes of §§ 71 and 215. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:23 am
Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 57071 (1966). [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:52 am
So far the Curia website does not indicate when we might expect to see the CJEU's decision. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:05 am
Say-on-Pay: Now 71 Failures - How Does That Compare With My Early Season Poll? [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
Benson, 409 U.S. 63, 71-72 (1972) and Parker v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:02 pm
At [71], it again took the view that the applicant's argument had been insufficiently 'concrete' to displace the Board of Appeal's assessment in relation to certain goods in Class 20. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
It is based on their recent paper, “Does Enhanced Disclosure Curb CEO Pay? [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:32 am
Does this mean at least some employees on 207 leaves are “separated from service” within the meaning of Section 71? [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Refusing to answer work-related questions in the course of an investigation 2015 NY Slip Op 01573, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe question of compelling a public officer or employee to testify or risk termination was considered by the Court of Appeals in Matt v LaRocca, 71 NY2d 154, cert denied 486 US 1007. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:45 am
Intermittent FMLA does not permit sleeping on the job (usually)Can an employer prohibit an employee from job hunting during FMLA leave? [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
No. 1:17-CV-1900, 2018 WL 1907335, at *2 (M.D. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:22 am
As companies continue to prioritise information security, an increasing part of an IT budget is spent on security; however, it often does not result in effective defences. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 8:33 am
The EPO will send the search results and any objections relating to each invention for which a search fee is paid in an annex to an Article 94(3) or Rule 71(3) communication. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm
Does 1-40, 326 F. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 9:07 pm
J.A. 61, 68, 71, 73. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, the court found that the Regulations were in conflict with provisions of the Education Law that authorize the Commissioner to prescribe regulations governing the certification of teachers and that require most teachers in charter schools and pre-kindergartens to be certified in the same manner as other public school teachers.Considering the guidelines first established in Boreali v Axelrod, 71 NY2d 1, the Appellate Division said it agreed with Supreme Court that… [read post]
